Trastornos esofágicos de la interacción intestino-cerebro: actualización basada en Roma V

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.1631

Palabras clave:

trastornos de la interacción cerebro-intestino, Manometría esofágica, disfagia, enfermedades del esófago

Resumen

Introducción: los trastornos esofágicos de la interacción intestino-cerebro se caracterizan por síntomas como pirosis, dolor torácico, sensación de globo y disfagia, en ausencia de alteraciones estructurales, inflamatorias, motoras o por reflujo que expliquen adecuadamente su presencia. Los criterios de Roma V incorporan los avances recientes en la evaluación fisiológica del esófago y deben interpretarse en conjunto con la Clasificación de Chicago v. 4.0 y el Consenso de Lyon 2.0.

Resultados: esta actualización revisa los cinco trastornos esofágicos de la interacción intestino-cerebro reconocidos por Roma V: dolor torácico funcional, pirosis funcional, hipersensibilidad esofágica, globo y disfagia funcional. Se analizan sus principales características clínicas, criterios diagnósticos, mecanismos fisiopatológicos y estrategias terapéuticas. Se destaca el papel central de la hipersensibilidad esofágica y de los mecanismos de procesamiento sensorial central, así como la influencia de la hipervigilancia y de factores cognitivos, afectivos y psicosociales en la percepción de los síntomas.

Conclusiones: Roma V propone un enfoque diagnóstico integrado que permite interpretar los síntomas esofágicos junto con los hallazgos endoscópicos y fisiológicos, con el fin de evitar la sobreinterpretación de alteraciones menores y la repetición innecesaria de estudios. Una vez excluidas las enfermedades estructurales, inflamatorias, motoras y por reflujo relevantes, el manejo debe orientarse hacia los mecanismos que mantienen los síntomas, incluidas la hipersensibilidad y la hipervigilancia. La educación del paciente, la neuromodulación y las intervenciones psicoconductuales constituyen herramientas relevantes, aunque la evidencia disponible para muchas de estas intervenciones continúa siendo limitada.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

MD, MSc, PhD Christian von Muhlenbrock, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Diseases (TARGID), Universidad de Leuven (KU Leuven), Leuven, Bélgica. Laboratorio Neurogastroenterológía, sección gastroenterología, Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile. Profesor asistente Departamento Medicina Interna, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile. 

MD Javier Venegas, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Residente de medicina interna, Departamento de medicina interna, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.

MD, MSc. Federico Aronsohn, Universidad de Los Andes, Chile

Profesor asistente medicina interna, departamento de medicina interna. Santiago, Chile.

Referencias bibliográficas

Gyawali CP, Roman S, Zerbib F, Savarino EV, Bhatia S, Fass R, et al. Functional Esophageal Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2026;170(6):1224-39. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2026.02.005

Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, et al. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut. 2024;73(2):361-71. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616

Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Prakash Gyawali C, Roman S, et al. Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(1):e14058. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14058

Von Muhlenbrock C, Núñez P, Quera R, Venegas J, Pacheco N, Herrera K, et al. Clinical description of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis treated at a Chilean university center. Rev Gastroenterol México Engl Ed. 2025;90(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmxen.2024.04.010

Oude Nijhuis RAB, Curvers WL, Van Der Ende M, Herregods TVK, Schuitenmaker JM, Smout AJPM, et al. Utility of Routine Esophageal Biopsies in Patients With Refractory Reflux Symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(4):816-20. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001064

Knowles CH, Aziz Q. Basic and clinical aspects of gastrointestinal pain. Pain. 2009;141(3):191-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.011

Ustaoglu A, Nguyen A, Spechler S, Sifrim D, Souza R, Woodland P. Mucosal pathogenesis in gastro‐esophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(12):e14022. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14022

Nikaki K, Woodland P, Lee C, Ghisa M, Marinelli C, Savarino E, et al. Esophageal mucosal innervation in functional heartburn: Closer to healthy asymptomatic subjects than to non‐erosive reflux disease patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31(9):e13667. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13667

Woodland P, Shen Ooi JL, Grassi F, Nikaki K, Lee C, Evans JA, et al. Superficial Esophageal Mucosal Afferent Nerves May Contribute to Reflux Hypersensitivity in Nonerosive Reflux Disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(5):1230-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.017

Richter JE, Barish CF, Castell DO. Abnormal sensory perception in patients with esophageal chest pain. Gastroenterology. 1986;91(4):845-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(86)90685-2

Nasr I, Attaluri A, Hashmi S, Gregersen H, Rao SSC. Investigation of esophageal sensation and biomechanical properties in functional chest pain. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;22(5):520-6, e116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01451.x

Yang M, Li ZS, Chen DF, Zou DW, Xu XR, Fang DC, et al. Quantitative Assessment and Characterization of Visceral Hyperalgesia Evoked by Esophageal Balloon Distention and Acid Perfusion in Patients With Functional Heartburn, Nonerosive Reflux Disease, and Erosive Esophagitis. Clin J Pain. 2010;26(4):326-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181c8fc83

Shapiro M, Green C, Bautista JM, Peru RL, Malagon IB, Corvo M, et al. Functional Heartburn Patients Demonstrate Traits of Functional Bowel Disorder but Lack a Uniform Increase of Chemoreceptor Sensitivity to Acid. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(5):1084-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00525.x

Guadagnoli L, Yadlapati R, Taft T, Pandolfino JE, Tye M, Keefer L. Esophageal hypervigilance is prevalent across gastroesophageal reflux disease presentations. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(8):e14081. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14081

Sperber AD, Bangdiwala SI, Drossman DA, Ghoshal UC, Simren M, Tack J, et al. Worldwide Prevalence and Burden of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Results of Rome Foundation Global Study. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(1):99-114.e3. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.014

Fass R, Dickman R. Non‐cardiac chest pain: an update. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(6):408-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00787.x

Fass R, Fennerty MB, Ofman JJ, Gralnek IM, Johnson C, Camargo E, et al. The clinical and economic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology. 1998;115(1):42-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70363-4

Weijenborg PW, De Schepper HS, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Effects of Antidepressants in Patients With Functional Esophageal Disorders or Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(2):251-259.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.06.025

Atluri DK, Chandar AK, Fass R, Falck‐Ytter Y. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for noncardiac chest pain. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41(2):167-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13015

Hurtte E, Rogers BD, Richards C, Gyawali CP. The clinical value of psycho‐gastroenterological interventions for functional esophageal symptoms. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(6):e14315. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14315

Luo Y, Keefer L. The Clinical value of brain‐gut behavioral therapies for functional esophageal disorders and symptoms. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022;34(6):e14373. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14373

Kisely SR, Campbell LA, Yelland MJ, Paydar A. Psychological interventions for symptomatic management of non-specific chest pain in patients with normal coronary anatomy. Cochrane Heart Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(6):CD004101. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004101.pub5

Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP, Masihi M, Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Nix BD, et al. Optimal Wireless Reflux Monitoring Metrics to Predict Discontinuation of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(10):1573-82. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001871

Spechler SJ, Hunter JG, Jones KM, Lee R, Smith BR, Mashimo H, et al. Randomized Trial of Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1513-23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1811424

Poh CH, Gasiorowska A, Navarro-Rodriguez T, Willis MR, Hargadon D, Noelck N, et al. Upper GI tract findings in patients with heartburn in whom proton pump inhibitor treatment failed versus those not receiving antireflux treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.08.024

Sifrim D, Roman S, Savarino E, Bor S, Bredenoord AJ, Castell D, et al. Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance-pH metrics: a consensus analysis of impedance-pH studies from around the world. Gut. 2021;70(8):1441-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322627

Sawada A, Guzman M, Nikaki K, Sonmez S, Yazaki E, Aziz Q, et al. Identification of Different Phenotypes of Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity and Implications for Treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19(4):690-698.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.063

Abdallah J, George N, Yamasaki T, Ganocy S, Fass R. Most Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Who Failed Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy Also Have Functional Esophageal Disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(6):1073-1080.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.06.018

Rengarajan A, Pomarat M, Zerbib F, Gyawali CP. Overlap of functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(6):e14056. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14056

Savarino E, Zentilin P, Tutuian R, Pohl D, Gemignani L, Malesci A, et al. Impedance-pH reflux patterns can differentiate non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn patients. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(2):159-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-011-0480-0

Ribolsi M, Cicala M, Zentilin P, Neri M, Mauro A, Efthymakis K, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of refractoriness to optimal proton pump inhibitor therapy in non‐erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(10):1074-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14986

Savarino E, Zentilin P, Savarino V. NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(6):371-80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.50

Weijenborg PW, Cremonini F, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. PPI therapy is equally effective in well‐defined non‐erosive reflux disease and in reflux esophagitis: a meta‐analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24(8):747-57, e350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01888.x

Viazis N, Keyoglou A, Kanellopoulos AK, Karamanolis G, Vlachogiannakos J, Triantafyllou K, et al. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hypersensitive Esophagus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1662-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.179

Broeders JAJL, Bredenoord AJ, Hazebroek EJ, Broeders IAMJ, Gooszen HG, Smout AJPM. Effects of anti-reflux surgery on weakly acidic reflux and belching. Gut. 2011;60(4):435-41. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.224824

Patel A, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Prevalence, characteristics, and treatment outcomes of reflux hypersensitivity detected on pH‐impedance monitoring. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(9):1382-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12838

Chen CL, Szczesniak MM, Cook IJ. Evidence for oesophageal visceral hypersensitivity and aberrant symptom referral in patients with globus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21(11):1142-e96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01316.x

Kwiatek MA, Mirza F, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE. Hyperdynamic upper esophageal sphincter pressure: a manometric observation in patients reporting globus sensation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(2):289-98. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2008.150

Harris MB, Deary IJ, Wilson JA. Life events and difficulties in relation to the onset of globus pharyngis. J Psychosom Res. 1996;40(6):603-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(96)00024-4

Bajbouj M, Becker V, Eckel F, Miehlke S, Pech O, Prinz C, et al. Argon plasma coagulation of cervical heterotopic gastric mucosa as an alternative treatment for globus sensations. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(2):440-4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.053

Poovipirom N, Ratta‐apha W, Maneerattanaporn M, Geeratragool T, Chuenprapai P, Leelakusolvong S. Treatment outcomes in patients with globus: A randomized control trial of psychoeducation, neuromodulators, and proton pump inhibitors. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023;35(3):e14500. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14500

Carlson DA, Baumann AJ, Donnan EN, Krause A, Kou W, Pandolfino JE. Evaluating esophageal motility beyond primary peristalsis: Assessing esophagogastric junction opening mechanics and secondary peristalsis in patients with normal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33(10):e14116. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14116

Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati R, Vela MF, Spechler SJ, Schnoll-Sussman FH, et al. A Standardized Approach to Performing and Interpreting Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry for Esophageal Motility Disorders: The Dallas Consensus. Gastroenterology. 2025;168(6):1114-1127.e5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2025.01.234

Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, Temple RD, Talley NJ, Grant Thompson W, et al. U. S. Householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders: Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38(9):1569-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303162

Bill J, Rajagopal S, Kushnir V, Gyawali CP. Diagnostic yield in the evaluation of dysphagia: experience at a single tertiary care center. Dis Esophagus. 2018;31(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy013

Carlson DA, Baumann AJ, Prescott JE, Schauer JM, Krause A, Donnan EN, et al. Prediction of Esophageal Retention: A Study Comparing High-Resolution Manometry and Functional Luminal Imaging Probe Panometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(10):2032-41. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001402

Mittal RK, Muta K, Ledgerwood-Lee M, Gandu V, Zifan A. Abnormal Esophageal Distension Profiles in Patients With Functional Dysphagia: A Possible Mechanism of Dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(5):1847-1849.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.12.002

Carlson DA, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Vela M, Taft TH, Crowell MD, et al. Esophageal Hypervigilance and Visceral Anxiety Are Contributors to Symptom Severity Among Patients Evaluated With High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(3):367-75. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000536

Smout A, Fox M. Weak and absent peristalsis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012;24 Suppl 1:40-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01831.x

Colon VJ, Young MA, Ramirez FC. The short- and long-term efficacy of empirical esophageal dilation in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(4):910-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01928.x

Jacob R, Danta M, Feller R, Williams D, Sanagapalli S. Empiric Esophageal Dilatation for Solid-Food Dysphagia: Presence of Mucosal Tear on Relook Endoscopy Predicts Symptomatic Response. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023;118(10):1888-90. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002319

Scolapio JS, Gostout CJ, Schroeder KW, Mahoney DW, Lindor KD. Dysphagia Without Endoscopically Evident Disease: To Dilate Or Not? Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(2):327-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03514.x

Figura 1. Algoritmo diagnóstico de los síntomas esofágicos y los trastornos de la interacción intestino-cerebro.

Descargas

Publicado

2026-09-11

Cómo citar

von Muhlenbrock, C., Venegas, J., & Aronsohn, F. (2026). Trastornos esofágicos de la interacción intestino-cerebro: actualización basada en Roma V. Revista Colombiana De Gastroenterología, 41(3), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.1631

Número

Sección

Revisión de tema

Métricas

Estadísticas de artículo
Vistas de resúmenes
Vistas de PDF
Descargas de PDF
Vistas de HTML
Otras vistas
Escanea para compartir
QR Code
Crossref Cited-by logo

Algunos artículos similares: