Diagnostic Efficacy of Fecal Calprotectin in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Literature Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.1060

Keywords:

Inflammatory bowel disease, fecal calprotectin, approval of diagnostic tests, biomarker, diagnostic efficacy

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease is a group of pathologies that include ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, which have similar manifestations. Currently, the diagnosis and monitoring of this disease rely mainly on endoscopic studies. Still, this method can hardly be applied to periodic disease monitoring as it is expensive, invasive, and not readily available. Fecal calprotectin is widely known, easy to use, and affordable, and it is currently the best-characterized biomarker for this pathology.

Materials and methods: The research design is a systematic diagnostic test validation literature review. A search was conducted in different databases using the QUADAS-2 checklist to evaluate the methodological quality.

Results: The initial search yielded 352,843 articles published chiefly in PubMed, followed by Scopus and Science Direct. After multiple filters, 221 papers were selected and wholly reviewed. They were evaluated with inclusion and exclusion criteria, with 18 articles being chosen.

Conclusions: Fecal calprotectin is a reliable surrogate marker of endoscopic activity in IBD. However, there is a lack of consensus on delimiting a cut-off point and improving applicability and diagnostic accuracy. Colonoscopy remains the gold standard in all studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juliana Gómez-Raigosa, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Americas

Médico epidemiólogo. Universidad de Caldas – Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de las Americas – Clinica Comfamiliar Risaralda. Manizales, Colombia.

Natalia Valencia Sánchez, Clínica San Rafel

Médica general. Socimédicos y Clínica San Rafael. Pereira, Colombia.

References

Aguirre D, Archila PE, Carrera J, Castaño R, Escobar CM, García Duperly R, et al. Consenso Colombiano de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal. Rev Col Gastroenterol. 2012;27(3 supl):s1-s44.

Juliao-Baños F, Puentes F, López R, Saffon MA, Reyes G, Parra V, et al. Caracterización de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en Colombia: resultados de un registro nacional. Rev Gastroenterol Méx. 2021;86(2):153-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmx.2020.05.005

Guardiola J, Lobatón T, Cerrillo E, Ferreiro-Iglesias R, Gisbert JP, Domènech E, et al. Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre la utilidad de la determinación de calprotectina fecal en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;41(8):514-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.05.029

Spiceland CM, Lodhia N. Endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: Role in diagnosis, management, and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(35):4014-20. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i35.4014

Juliao-Baños F, Arrubla M, Osorio L, Camargo J, Londoño J, Cáceres C, et al. Caracterización y prevalencia de manifestaciones extraintestinales en una cohorte de pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal en Medellín (Colombia). Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;44(6):398-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.07.012

Seyedian SS, Nokhostin F, Malamir MD. A review of the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment methods of inflammatory bowel disease. J Med Life. 2019;12(2):113-22. https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2018-0075

Frolkis A, Dieleman LA, Barkema HW, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Fedorak RN, et al. Environment and the inflammatory bowel diseases. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(3):e18-24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/102859

Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Rawsthorne P, Wajda A. Epidemiology of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis in a Central Canadian Province: A Population-based Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(10):916-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009735

Ng SC, Shi HY, Hamidi N, Underwood FE, Tang W, Benchimol EI, et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: a systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet. 2017;390(10114):2769-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32448-0

Kotze PG, Underwood FE, Damião AOMC, Ferraz JGP, Saad-Hossne R, Toro M, et al. Progression of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Throughout Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18(2):304-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.06.030

Orcajo-Castelán R, Sidonio-Aguayo B, Alcacio-Mendoza JA, López-Díaz GL. Análisis comparativo de pruebas de tamiz para la detección de problemas en el desarrollo diseñadas y validadas en México. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México. 2015;72(6):364-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmhimx.2015.11.004

Hosseini P, Whincup R, Devan K, Ghanem DA, Fanshawe JB, Saini A, et al. The role of the electroencephalogram (EEG) in determining the aetiology of catatonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. EClinicalMedicine. 2023;56:101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101808

Røseth AG, Fagerhol MK, Aadland E, Schjønsby H. Assessment of the neutrophil dominating protein calprotectin in feces. A methodologic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(9):793-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529209011186

Rodrigo L. Calprotectina fecal. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2007;99(12):683-8. https://doi.org/10.4321/S1130-01082007001200001

van Rheenen PF, Van de Vijver E, Fidler V. Faecal calprotectin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c3369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3369

Lin J-F, Chen J-M, Zuo J-H, Yu A, Xiao Z-J, Deng F-H, et al. Meta-analysis: Fecal Calprotectin for Assessment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(8):1407-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0000000000000057

Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, Kandala NB, Shyangdan D, Arasaradnam R, et al. Faecal calprotectin testing for differentiating amongst inflammatory and non-inflammatory bowel diseases: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(55):xv-xix, 1-211. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta17550

Rokkas T, Portincasa P, Koutroubakis IE. Fecal calprotectin in assessing inflammatory bowel disease endoscopic activity: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2018;27(3):299-306. https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.273.pti

Boube M, Laharie D, Nancey S, Hebuterne X, Fumery M, Pariente B, et al. Variation of faecal calprotectin level within the first three months after bowel resection is predictive of endoscopic postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2020;52(7):740-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2020.03.020

Figura 1. Diagrama de flujo del proceso de selección de artículos. Figura elaborada por los autores

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Gómez-Raigosa, J., & Valencia Sánchez, N. (2023). Diagnostic Efficacy of Fecal Calprotectin in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Literature Review. Revista Colombiana De Gastroenterología, 38(4), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.22516/25007440.1060

Issue

Section

Originals articles

Altmetric

Crossref Cited-by logo
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views
QR Code

Some similar items: